This case is often referenced in advocacy circles, but the actual legal trajectory is more nuanced than many realize. Here’s a breakdown of what really happened:
What Happened in Denmark in 2019?
Who Initiated the Legal Opinion?
The legal opinion was requested by a coalition of Danish civil society groups, including:
- The Council for Health-Safe Telecommunications
- The EHS Association (representing electrohypersensitive individuals)
- The Danish Health Association
- Rachel Santini, head of the scientist network at the Danish Institute for Public Health
These groups were concerned about the health and environmental risks of 5G and sought a legal foundation to challenge its deployment.
Who Wrote the Opinion?
The legal expert was Christian F. Jensen, an attorney-at-law based in Holte, Denmark. He authored a 75-page legal opinion dated May 4, 2019, concluding that 5G deployment—as then described—would likely violate:
- The European Convention on Human Rights
- The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
- EU environmental directives
- The Bern and Bonn Conventions on biodiversity protection
Jensen’s analysis emphasized the precautionary principle, citing scientific evidence of biological harm from radiofrequency radiation—even within ICNIRP limits.
Did It Go to the European Court of Human Rights?
No. Despite the strength of the legal opinion, no formal case was filed or accepted by the ECHR. Here’s why:
- The opinion was pre-litigation—a strategic tool to raise awareness and potentially support future legal action.
- No public record exists in the HUDOC database or ECHR annual reports showing a 5G-related case from Denmark.
- In 2024, the ECHR handled 75 Danish applications, but none involved 5G or EMF exposure.
It’s possible that the groups considered filing but either didn’t meet admissibility criteria or chose to focus on national-level advocacy instead.
How Was It Publicized?
The legal opinion was circulated through:
- Advocacy websites like Zero5G
- Environmental Health Trust and other EMF safety networks
- Stop 5G campaigns across Europe, where it was translated and cited in public forums
However, it did not receive mainstream media coverage in Denmark or internationally. Its visibility has remained largely within activist, scientific, and legal advocacy circles.
Strategic Takeaway
This case is a powerful example of how civil society can use legal tools to challenge tech deployment, even without a formal court ruling.
The pdf below is a 75 page document…This image is the conclusion statement, but I strongly encourage you to at least scroll through this important document. Your ignorance is killing me and many other fellow humans and life forms!
Below is a document I created in the fall of 2022 after 7+ years of injury and isolation as I try to wake up the world to what’s being built around them w/o their awareness:
11,000 pages of evidence of harm, and yet…more continues to rollout unbridled!
Neighbors Organizing Against Trespassing Technology 