REPORT: USAF – RF/Microwave Radiation Biological Effects (1994)

“Electroplague” what a great description of our current world

Telecom tower

Posted: September 6, 2014

In 1994, the US Air Force published a 32-page report titled: “Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation Biological Effects and Safety Standards: A Review,” authored by Scott M. Bolen. The supervising agency was Rome Laboratory at Griffiss Air Force Base in New York. 

Read and download the complete 32-page report here: USAF Report 1994 Biological-Effects .

To this day, many if not most governmental agencies and scientists in North America and abroad maintain the position that RF and microwave radiation are only damaging to the human body at power densities high enough to cause a heating effect (a so-called “thermal effect”), like a microwave oven. The position, while completely unsupported by fact, is very convenient for the multi-billion-dollar telecommunications industry (cell phones, WiFi) as well as the military’s own use of these same technologies—technologies whose radiation is, for the most part nonthermal, in nature. 

In fact, the serious bio-toxic consequences of nonthermal RF and microwave radiation have been know for decades by our governments and the military. This 1994 USAF report states on page 2, under the heading of Biological Effects: 

“Nonthermal responses can be less noticeable and are often more difficult to explain than thermal effects. These responses are related to the disturbances in the tissue not caused by heating. Electromagnetic fields can interact with the bioelectric functions of the irradiated human tissue. Research conducted in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe suggests that the human body may be more sensitive to the nonthermal effects of RF/MW radiation.”

And from page 18 of the report:

“Nonthermal disruptions have been observed to occur at power densities that are much lower than are necessary to induce thermal effects. Soviet researchers have attributed alterations in the central nervous system and the cardiovascular system to the nonthermal effect of low level RF/MW radiation exposure.”

And from the report’s Conclusion, also on page 18:

“Experimental evidence has shown that exposure to low intensity radiation can have a profound effect on biological processes. The nonthermal effects of RF/MW radiation exposure are becoming important measures of biological interaction with EM fields… Adherence to the ANSI Standard should provide protection against harmful thermal effects and help to minimize the interaction of EM fields with the biological processes of the human body.”

In other words, this USAF report from 1994 all but states that the ANSI (American National Standards Institute) Standard of the day was insufficient for protecting the public from the nonthermal effects of RF/MW radiation.

At the time this report was written, that Standard for exposure was set at 50,000 mW/m2 (5 mW/cm2 ) for for frequencies between 1,500 MHz to 100,000 MHz. Today, the maximum exposure limit set by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) for RF radiation in the 850-2400 MHz range (smart meters and other wireless devices) is 10,000 mW/m2. However, that level is more than one million times higher than the exposure limits set out in the 2012 BioInitiative Report. The BioInitiative Report caps exposure to RF radiation at 0.006 mW/m.

The point being: the “safe” levels for RF/MW exposure that are laid out in this 1994 USAF report, as well as in current “safe” levels stipulated by North American governments (such as Canada’s Safety Code 6 and the FCC in the US) only address thermal effects of RF/MW radiation and have no bearing whatsoever on the far more serious nonthermal effects that unequivocally exist. The public is simply not being protected.

Kim Goldberg

Original Source: https://electroplague.com/2014/09/06/report-usaf-rfmicrowave-radiation-biological-effects-1994/

3 thoughts on “REPORT: USAF – RF/Microwave Radiation Biological Effects (1994)

    1. Nice to see this source from you. I’m reading my third book on the subject of Sovereignty and have one more big one and a few small ones. Just finished Fruit From a Poisonous Tree by Melvin Stamper, J.D. What an eye-opener it was. It was after the Public Health Warning booklet came out here and had 4 months to start being circulated that my world became very still. Living insulated in the Arkansas Ozarks it’s already pretty still but energetically when new information wants to present I sense it even more. I acknowledged and watched as this issue of discovering our Sovereignty and REdiscovering the Declaration of Independence began presenting from numerous sources, some kind of suprising one’s and so my research began. I’d known about Anna von Reitz for a few years but we were busy fleeing the tech saturated world in a MAJOR move so I didn’t have time. Then came recovery from said move and turning this place into home base. It absolutely seems to be trending which is a very good sign. See it was my “allergy to the wireless world” that made it so clear that WE THE PEOPLE no longer have any “Unalienable Rights” which begs further inquiry about what happened to them…THEY’RE SUPPOSED TO BE UNALIENABLE….UNABLE TO BE VIOLATED…. THIS is what Americans need to see, learn, and reinstate for it is OUR DUTY! At the same time, trying to convince a “Christian nation” that it isn’t an absolute fact that they’re going to be beamed up for a wedding feast so it’s okay if they microwave everything on their way up n out. I made a post graphic recently pointing them to Psalm 37 which says over and over and over that God plans to make Earth our home and remove the evil ones. Their absolute certainty that we no longer need this planet is quite disturbing. Even if they’re right and get beamed up I don’t think I’d want to meet THE CREATOR when I just trashed His creation. LOL…. Thanks for the feedback and presence.

      Like

Leave a reply to New Human New Earth Cancel reply