Shaping Research Agenda in the Wake of 5G Tech 2019
Funny but I was reading through this and thinking, “Though the WHO recognizes the potential for harm they are a control arm of government/s so I don’t trust them and sure enough…at the bottom of the pdf it shows this, which is a lie…to say that “there are no substantive health issues related to ELF electric fields at levels generally encountered by members of the public”. This may have been true at one point but not that wireless is allll over the planet this is not true generally. With regard to ELF specifically I’ll let other experts answer that question but I’ll have to find that document but I know I’ve read it.
When I was first injured the WHO recommended a person who thinks they’re being adversely affected by wireless do the following things. Number 1 was to seek psychological counseling. Number 2 was to consider dietary changes. FINALLY, NUMBER 3, they recommend checking the environment for unsafe readings and mitigate. Now isn’t that stupid? Why wouldn’t you check the environment FIRST before assuming the person is mentally unstable as the only explanation. I swear I’m so disgusted by this Rx drug crazed world of fools I live in. It makes me sick to see fellow humans this gullible but I think they’re waking up! I HOPE THEY ARE!
The full WHO document is below which provides some good basic information but I would NEVER accept them as a trustworthy source. THEY LIE!
Oh, look what I found:
I’m pretty sure I could gather a dozen experts who would speak to the destructive force of ELF’s so again, the WHO is not a trustworthy source.
Here’s another one showing collusion with Russia to bring this “weaponry” into the USA:
Neighbors Organizing Against Trespassing Technology 