Original Source link I suggest you visit so you can leave comments on her posts, see other articles, and perhaps become a subscriber to her substack promoting MORE great content through her: https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/digital-dilemma-a-groundbreaking?fbclid=IwY2xjawFS0ONleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHcVoX6t86NEPdBrxYwIen70e3XKY1xLEsNlCJyrEinyXV-KTJvKimsVJcQ_aem_ofgjBXqGQb0reu5Si388Aw
In this eye-opening premiere interview, I speak with Swiss activist Christian Oesch and German filmmaker Klaus Scheidsteger to discuss their groundbreaking documentary “Digital Dilemma.” The film uncovers the invisible dangers of our increasingly wireless world and some shocking truths about electromagnetic radiation exposure.
One of the most startling revelations comes from the ATHEM3 study, which assessed oxidative stress and genetic instability from mobile radio frequency exposure.
The study uncovers that everyday RF levels are 7.5 times higher than those permitted in nuclear power plants.
That’s right. If you and I were sitting in a nuclear power plant and got the above RF reading, we would be told to get the hell out. And yet, these are the levels that are found every day near cell antennas and our wifi-saturated environments.
Even more concerning, it was discovered that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been using biological limit values rather than physical measurements for decades, potentially masking the true extent of radiation exposure.
In other words, the study uncovered that the IAEA has been setting safety standards for decades based on biological indicators rather than direct physical measurements of radiation.
This means….
….. they’ve been basing their guidelines on how radiation affects living organisms instead of measuring the actual radiation levels in the environment. This approach may have led to underestimating the true extent of radiation exposure in everyday settings.
CHROMOSOMAL DAMAGE DETECTED
“When you hear that cell phone towers cause cancer, the first logical question is: How is that possible? The limits protect us!”
The Viennese researcher commented: “Yes, that’s right, the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation) limits for EMF/electromagnetic fields protect us from burns, but not from cancer . The IAEA has limits that can protect us from exposure-related cancer. However, the IAEA does not limit physical emissions (W/m²), but rather biological effects (chromosome damage), and these are precisely the effects we have found – exposure-associated.
To put it bluntly: Because it is not about overheating (ICNIRP) but about cancer, we use the experience (and rules) of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) to classify the findings.”
THEN THERE IS 5G
This is your DNA ( a blueprint for a living thing):
…
From this point I strongly suggest you click this link and go to her actual posts for more meat! https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/digital-dilemma-a-groundbreaking?fbclid=IwY2xjawFS0ONleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHcVoX6t86NEPdBrxYwIen70e3XKY1xLEsNlCJyrEinyXV-KTJvKimsVJcQ_aem_ofgjBXqGQb0reu5Si388Aw
Neighbors Organizing Against Trespassing Technology 